Why the "World" Series?

As a baseball fan, it has always perplexed me as to why it was named the "World Series" when it was merely a series between to American teams only 650 miles from each other. Not to mention the fact that both teams were comprised of white, American men. This series may have featured two of baseball's best players facing off against each other (Boston's Cy Young and Pittsburgh's Honus Wagner), but there was really no reason for the series to be classified as a World Series. However, this name has endured for more than one hundred years, so there has to be come justifications. I think there are two main aspects to consider: the internal diversities that are intrinsic in baseball today, and the implicit meanings of the word 'world'. I'll start with the former.
Baseball may have been an equating institution from a socio-economic point of view in 1903, but it certainly was not the cultural melting pot that it is today. Neither players nor spectators needed to be concerned with their economic background during the game. Anyone could play--as long as he was white. Before leading the country in the civil rights crusade, baseball was one of the most viciously racist institutions in America. Contrary to popular (and seemingly unanimous) belief, Jackie Robinson was not the first African-American to take the field. It was Moses Fleetwood Walker, who played for the short-lived American Association's Toledo Blue Stockings until his expulsion from baseball in 1887 when Cap Anson refused to play with an African American on the field.

It is remarkable to see how far baseball has come. Despite its previous racist tendencies, baseball was the leader and catalyst for the Civil Rights Movement. Jackie Robinson's courage and bravery when he took the field in 1947 for the Brooklyn Dodgers paved the way for not only African American players, but also players from all over the world to write their pages in the eternal textbook of baseball.

What would baseball be today without the legacies of Jackie Robinson stealing home 19 times, Willie Mays' famous catch in the 1954 World Series, Bob Gibson's 17 strikeouts in Game 1 of the 1968 World Series, the tragic story of Roy Campanella's paralysis, or Satchel Paige's ability to devestate hitters at the age of 60? Baseball's history would certainly be less colorful without these timeless stories.

Had baseball's color barrier not been broken, we would also lack the spice that Latin American players have brought upon baseball. No one will forget the tragic legacy of Roberto Clemente, Pedro Martinez's record setting 1999 season, or Luis Tiant's crazy windup. No one will forget watching Mariano Rivera, the greatest closer of all time, pitch, or "Manny being Manny" or David Ortiz's former knack for hitting walk-off home runs.
Despite this internal cultural diversity, the World Baseball Classic is still more qualified to be called the World Series than the World Series is! The World Baseball Classic is what the World Series theoretically should be: a series in which two different countries play against each other. So why do we insist on calling this event the World Series? An interesting point to consider is who makes up a significant portion of the rosters for each country in the World Baseball Classic: Major League Baseball players. Many MLB players are asked by their home countries to play in the Classic, which is quite an honor for them. In effect, Major League Baseball represents many different countries, so perhaps it is justifiable to call baseball's most important series the World Series.
Take the 2009 World Series for example, the Philadelphia Phillies roster included Jimmy Rollins, Pedro Martinez, Raul Ibañez, Chan Ho Park, and Shane Victorino. The Yankees World Series roster included Mariano Rivera, Jorge Posada, Robinson Cano, Hideki Matsui, and Joba Chamberlain. Baseball has truly evolved into a World Series, but the remarkable thing is that despite their cultural differences, each team comes together to form one, cohesive team with one, collective goal: to win the World Series.
Another point to investigate is that perhaps Mr. Johnson and Mr. Spalding did not intend the explicit meaning of the word 'World'. When we think of the World, we think of the Earth, and all the countries, which is why it may seem that the World Baseball Classic is more qualified to be called a World Series. However, as an adjective, 'world' can denote the most important or influential thing of its class, or social interaction. The World Series is the most important series in baseball, and it certainly promotes social interaction. Every game is sold out, and everyone in attendance shares a collective love of the game. Perhaps the most important role that the World Series serves is that it unites.
The 105th World Series was nothing short of these characteristics. The matchup between Cliff Lee and CC Sabathia was enthralling. The matchup was more than two aces pitted against each other; it was two former teammates, and two Cy Young recipients fighting to the finish. Despite the historical stature of game one, the most captivating moment for me was when Pedro Martinez took the hill at the new Yankee Stadium. The second game of the series was the first time he had taken the hill against the Yankees in a postseason game since he did it in a Red Sox uniform in 2004. Martinez's history against the Yankees is one of the most fascinating in baseball's rich history. Martinez's 1999 season is considered by many to be the best of all time, and he won back-to-back Cy Young awards in 1999 and 2000. His mere presence provokes the Yankees and their fans alike considering that Martinez has instigated some of the most famous brawls in Red Sox vs. Yankees history. Yankee fans love to chant "Who's Your Daddy" while Martinez is on the mound, and he loves to hear it. Perhaps the most remarkable matchup was the sixth game and final game when Pedro Martinez and Andy Petite faced off. It was Martinez's 40th career start against the Yankees, and Petite's 40th postseason start, and perhaps the final starts of each of their careers. MLB Network did this beautiful montage before Game 6 of all of the famous Pedro moments, and it was so emotional for me. There is something about Pedro's eloquence during his press conferences, and his smile as he walked off the field that continually give me chills. Watching him pitch is something that I will always cherish in my heart.
Johnson and Spalding were both visionary men, but it is hard to imagine that they would have predicted that baseball would become as culturally diverse as it is. So why did they choose to call it the World Series? Besides the fact that it is baseball's most important series, and its constant tendency to promote social interaction and unite baseball fans everywhere, I think there is one more thing. Baseball is a world in and of itself: it is survival of the fittest (or perhaps the richest), the best team wins. There is a central governing body that makes and maintains the rules, and there are umpires delegated to keep order in the games. Each game is a battle, which is part of an intricate war to win the World Series, and during the offseason, the teams are trading their cultivated players in hopes of becoming stronger for next year's war. I think that it is perfectly justifiable to call the most important series in baseball the World Series. It's culturally diverse, it promotes social interaction, it unites, and most importantly? It sure as hell means the world to me.




![Aggravation[1].jpg](http://redsoxgirl46.mlblogs.com/Aggravation%5B1%5D.jpg)











